The method can also be used for machine learning, data analysis and computer vision, researchers said. "The short story is, the prediction was right.. The researchers then tested a https://www.chinaembroiderymachine.net/ computational algorithm to allow machines (very simple neural networks) to complete the same tests. "How do we make sense of so much data around us, of so many different types, so quickly and robustly " said Santosh Vempala, from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Test subjects were shown the whole image for 10 seconds, then randomly shown 16 sketches of each. Using abstract images ensured that neither humans nor machines had any prior knowledge of what the objects were. We also can identify an object when just a portion is visible, such as the corner of a bed or the hinge of a door.15 per cent of the total data is enough for humans," she said. The researchers studied human performance in "random projection" tests to find how well humans learn an object. Washington: Humans can categorise data using less than one per cent of the original information, say scientists, including those of Indian-origin, who have found an algorithm to explain human learning.
"This fascinating paper introduces a localised random projection that compresses images while still making it possible for humans and machines to distinguish broad categories," said Sanjoy Dasgupta, professor at the University of California San Diego. "We hypothesised that random projection could be one way humans learn," said Rosa Arriaga, from Georgia Tech. The researchers wanted to come up with a mathematical definition of what typical and atypical stimuli look like and, from that, predict which data would be hardest for the human and the machine to learn. The researchers created three families of abstract images at 150x150 pixels, then very small ’random sketches’ of those images. The study was published in the journal NeuralComputation.
Humans and machines performed equally well, demonstrating that indeed one can predict which data will be hardest to learn over time. They presented test subjects with original, abstract images and asked whether they could correctly identify that same image when randomly shown just a small portion of it.Humans learn to very quickly identify complex objects and variations of them. "We were surprised by how close the performance was between extremely simple neural networks and humans," Vempala said. Humans learn to very quickly identify complex objects and variations of them. We generally recognise an ’A’ no matter what the font, texture or background, for example, or the face of a coworker even if she puts on a hat or changes her hairstyle. Machines performed as well as humans, which provides a new understanding of how humans learn.
"This fascinating paper introduces a localised random projection that compresses images while still making it possible for humans and machines to distinguish broad categories," said Sanjoy Dasgupta, professor at the University of California San Diego. "We hypothesised that random projection could be one way humans learn," said Rosa Arriaga, from Georgia Tech. The researchers wanted to come up with a mathematical definition of what typical and atypical stimuli look like and, from that, predict which data would be hardest for the human and the machine to learn. The researchers created three families of abstract images at 150x150 pixels, then very small ’random sketches’ of those images. The study was published in the journal NeuralComputation.
Humans and machines performed equally well, demonstrating that indeed one can predict which data will be hardest to learn over time. They presented test subjects with original, abstract images and asked whether they could correctly identify that same image when randomly shown just a small portion of it.Humans learn to very quickly identify complex objects and variations of them. "We were surprised by how close the performance was between extremely simple neural networks and humans," Vempala said. Humans learn to very quickly identify complex objects and variations of them. We generally recognise an ’A’ no matter what the font, texture or background, for example, or the face of a coworker even if she puts on a hat or changes her hairstyle. Machines performed as well as humans, which provides a new understanding of how humans learn.
コメント